Yet despite the law, indigenous peoples and forests in the Peruvian Amazon continue to face threats from oil companies, oil palm plantations, loggers, gold miners, and others. Partly as a result of the Baguazo events, in 2011 the Peruvian Congress passed a law recognizing indigenous peoples' right to free prior and informed consent, in relation to policies and investments that affect their territories. They even said that the demonstrators had a right to block highways because they did so in an effort to defend a healthy environment-a “higher purpose,” the judges said, than ensuring that commercial trucks could pass through on time. Based on extensive anthropological testimony, the judges' ruling explains in depth why the indigenous demonstrators behaved as they did. They noted that Peruvian law respects legal pluralism and indigenous peoples' traditional legal systems. The judges ruled that calling for and participating in demonstrations was not subversive-it was an exercise of the right to free expression. On September 22, the three presiding judges unanimously found the defendants not guilty of all charges, noting that all those who died were killed by bullets, and the indigenous defendants were not carrying guns. The film’s national premiere in Peru comes at a fitting time in the story of the case it documents. Today, the film opens in Peru-where its dramatic narrative is set, and where it will undoubtedly rekindle national debate about the lessons from the Baguazo. It is set to premiere in Australia, India, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. “ The film makes its case powerfully,” wrote critic Dennis Harvey in Variety, noting its resonance with “myriad parallel situations in which private commercial interests continue to trump environmental ones worldwide.” When Two Worlds Collide premiered at the Sundance Film Festival earlier this year and has won critical acclaim and widespread coverage. When Two Worlds Collide-a documentary eight years in the making by first-time filmmakers Heidi Brandenburg and Matthew Orzel, produced with Ford’s support-captures this conflict between indigenous communities determined to protect their tribal lands, and government-supported business interests eager to open those lands up to oil drilling, mining, and clear-cutting. For the past 28 months, they have traveled constantly from remote rural areas to the court in Bagua for legal proceedings, and have endured great hardships to pay their legal expenses. All of them proclaimed their innocence and claimed the government was using them as scapegoats for the tragic violence. The leaders were charged with numerous counts of murder, subversion, rioting, and blocking access, among other crimes. The ensuing crisis led Prime Minister Yehude Simon to resign and the Peruvian Congress to finally repeal the objectionable laws.įive years later, the government pressed criminal charges against 52 indigenous leaders for the events of June 5, known popularly as the Baguazo. Twenty-three police officers and 10 civilians were killed, and countless others were injured. On June 5, 2009, President Alan García declared a state of emergency and sent troops to clear the highways, unleashing mayhem. Months of protests followed, and indigenous peoples blocked highways as they demanded the laws be repealed. These laws posed a major threat to the environment, as well as to the rights of indigenous peoples who relied on the forest and rivers. In 2008, the Peruvian government approved laws facilitating oil drilling and logging in the Amazon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |